If not for the “Bombs For Democracy” campaign being waged by the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia and the other NATO countries, in order to topple mostly secular Muslim countries, there would be no Muslim refugee crisis – period. Many people, such as Ron Paul have been screaming from the roof tops for decades that our illegal and immoral meddling/invasions in these countries would result in the exact scenario we see unfolding today. The rise of Islamic militants and the refugee crisis were as predictable as the setting sun.

It is a tragedy of monumental proportions and a humanitarian nightmare that the West has created in this region. There is no doubt that the legitimately displaced refugees that felt they had to flee or be killed, have a valid reason for hating the people who they perceive are responsible for their demise. However, this is the point where the refugee/multiculturalism narrative pushed by the corrupt corporate media goes from partial truth to mostly fiction.

The official narrative pushed by the MSM is that most of these refugees are fleeing ISIS from Syria. This is false. A majority of the refugees are coming from North Africa countries and Iraq.

Why are most of the refugees male of military age? UN documents show 72% are mostly single men, 13% women and 15% children. Who exactly is paying and providing the massive amount of logistics support like, water, food, shelter, transportation, sanitation, security and medical treatment for these hundred of thousands of refugees? The Red Cross is not capable of providing this kind of support for that many people without advanced knowledge and coordinated support from European governmental agencies.

If one steps back and takes an unbiased look at what’s going on in Europe, it resembles an invasion. Most of these unfortunate people are probably legitimate refugees who have suffered more than most Americans or Europeans alive today can imagine. However, the massive flow and sudden increase of refugees into Europe – as if a dam had suddenly burst open, the complete disregard by the European governments for the legitimate concerns of their own citizens and the apparent fore knowledge of this mass immigration by European governments, all, combined with the whole “white privilege” and “all whites are racist” narratives pushed by the establishment, are making people wonder if there isn’t some hidden agenda at work here. Remember, “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

This crisis appears to be the perfect “divide and conquer” technique that has been used by the ruling elite to conquer and destroy nations from within for thousands of years.

Aldous Huxley, author of “Brave New World”, said in his 1962 Berkeley speech, “There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.” To listen or read this astonishing confession by a true insider, google – Aldous Huxley, 1962 Berkeley Speech.

Why is it that when people from Western European countries and the U.S. simply talk about taking some common sense measures, like slowing this flood of refugees to a manageable level and implementing better, more thorough vetting procedures, are they called racist? Why, when two of the richest countries in the region, Israel and Saudi Arabia, refuse to take any refugees, are they not called out by the MSM as being racist? These two countries are orders-of-magnitude more responsible for this humanitarian crisis than any of the “racist” European countries, yet the corporate media says nothing. Why do the criminal politicians who are responsible for this humanitarian nightmare get a free pass from the corporate media?

Under the tyranny of Political Correctness and tolerance, Western European countries are being forced to accept this flood of refugees, many of whom have no documentation at all and are completely intolerant of Western ideas, principles and values.

“Orthodox Islam is a threefold system—a religious-political-cultural ideology—with the goal to subjugate the world to itself” says Philip Hitti, the late Lebanese scholar who taught at Princeton University for 50 years.

In the West, there is generally a clear boundary between these three systems. In Orthodox Islamic countries there is only one system that encompasses all three ideologies. This is why, from an Orthodox Muslims perspective, they don’t care about the laws of the country they happen to be in. If a law conflicts with Islamic law, they follow Islamic law, period. They are simply applying the scriptures as they are taught to do.

Orthodox Christianity and Judaism on the other hand is a religious ideologies only.

Please remember I’m only referring to Orthodox Muslims in this article. It’s difficult or impossible to find percentages of Orthodox vs non Orthodox Muslim, but the percentage of Orthodox Muslim immigrants are definitely high enough to create severe problems for the countries in which they immigrate to.

Brahmin Sene, who has lived and worked in several muslim counties for the past 20 years says, “In Muhammad’s day, conquered Jews and Christians who did not convert to Islam were allowed to live, provided they paid jizya, a ‘protection’ tax. Pagans were only given the choice to convert or die. This was the ‘peace’ offered by 7th century Islam. To this day, in every country where Islamic law (Shari’a) is embraced, non-Muslims (and, yes, women) are treated as second-class citizens. Freedom of religion is forbidden. For a Muslim to ‘apostatize’ means, at the very least: severe harassment, or worse: imprisonment, torture and death.”

All one has to do is ask any Orthodox Muslim man if they would allow their wife or daughter to walk around in an Orthodox Muslim community wearing the type of cloths that 99% of Western woman wear. The answer would be NO!, virtually 100% of the time. Does this mean that Orthodox Muslims are intolerant of Western values? Yes, it does, at least this one value.

A politician in Sweden was convicted of a “hate crime” for pointing out the fact that nearly all of the rapes in Sweden are committed by Muslim men against Swedish woman. The insane judge, in his sentencing statement said that is does not matter that the facts in this case are correct, it is still a hate crime to point out these facts. This is one example of the insane level of indoctrination that has occurred in Western Europe and the US.

Is it racist to point out these facts? The answer to that question depends on your level of indoctrination.

The problem that the hardcore feminist have with this is that two of their core beliefs contradiction one another. They believe woman should be able to dress any way they desire and go anywhere they want, without consequences. They also believe that all people, all races, all religions, all ideologies, other than white Christian males are completely tolerant of other people’s races, religions and ideologies.

One can deny these facts in order to be considered tolerant, politically correct and to avoid the “racist” label but lying to yourself will not change these facts.

The Swedish corporate media, by cowardly maintaining their politically correct reporting are complicit in the Swedish rape epidemic. In Sweden, the rape rate has exploded by 1400% since the mass immigration of Muslims began into the country. Muslim men are 20 times more likely per capita to rape a Swedish woman (reported by the Swedish National Council) than a Swedish man is to rape a Swedish woman.

The hypocrisy of feminists on this issue is staggering. Do they think that pretending Orthodox Muslim men respect women will somehow make it so? It won’t. Pretending that all people on Earth share the same values such as respect for women is like looking out the window at a torrential downpour and pretending it’s not raining.

One of the main historical functions of men has been to protect the family. Think what you want about the feminist movement but without a doubt, feminism has, if not completely destroyed this once noble trait, has severely weakened it to the point where many men no longer feel comfortable defending women. In some perverse way, it is now considered sexist to defend a woman. Feminists believe that women do not need to be defended. I’ll bet the thousands of women in Europe who have been raped, beaten and murdered would argue this point.

Pretending that all religions, cultures and people will blend in perfectly well together and just “get along”, is absurd and dangerous.

European women are being sacrificed on the alter of multiculturalism.

Jamie Fagan